Samsung Q4 15A – King of volume

Reply to this post

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Volume and scale remains essential for Samsung.

  • Samsung reported disappointing Q4 15A results where I think that most of the slowness came from components rather than handsets.
  • Q4 15A revenues / EBIT were guided to be KRW53.3tn / KRW6.1tn representing margins of 11.5% and YoY growth of 15% for Q4 and 7% for the full year.
  • This was below consensus of KRW 53.6tn / KRW 6.6tn and RFM at KRW55.6tn / KRW7.8tn.
  • Samsung has given no details at this stage of the performance of the individual divisions but I suspect that that miss has come mostly from the components business.
  • There is also likely to have been some weakness in handsets but as Samsung typically winds down inventory in Q4, this is not unexpected.
  • However, what is clear is that expectations for the smartphone market in 2016 have been too high and this is now being reflected in lower orders for components going forward.
  • RFM has already taken this weakness into account and is forecasting just 3% growth in smartphone shipments in 2016E compared to 14% in 2015A.
  • Since the reduction in market share and profitability of the handset business, Device Solutions (components) has been the torch bearer for Samsung and remains its best chance of steady growth.
  • The greatest worry from these numbers is the fall in profitability which is now 11.5% compared to 14.3% in Q3 15A.
  • Samsung’s ability to make superior margins by selling vast volumes of commodity products is the real strength of this company which is why maintaining sales is so important.
  • Hence when sales fall short and margins decline, it is not a good sign.
  • The component business tends to ship one quarter ahead of the end demand and it looks like the soft outlook for 2016 has taken its toll.
  • However, I suspect that much of its competition in both handsets and semiconductors has fared considerably worse and as a result, I see this as a sign of market conditions rather than a slip at Samsung.
  • I still think that Samsung can return to steady earnings growth driven by its component business but the slowing handset market is making life difficult.
  • I believe that the market has an overly negative view on Samsung and it see it as the only handset with upside in 2016.
  • I think that Apple will fare reasonably well but it now needs to find another product category to reignite growth after its truly mighty iPhone 6 product cycle.
  • Samsung is more reasonably priced with a clearer route to growth which is why I prefer it.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

A key for Samsung’s component business is how much of Apple’s processor business it can hang on to. Apple probably wants 2 sources and currently the best options are TSMC and Samsung. If however, Intel decides to use its surplus capacity to bid for Apple’s business, then Samsung is more likely to lose out.

Supplying Apple with OLED screens may make up the revenue but, without Apple’s processor business, Samsung will find it more expensive to keep its Exynos processors at the leading edge.

HI Tim
This is true but if you look at the numbers System LSI is still only a small part of the overall numbers. This means that fluctuations in processor market share at Apple wont move the needle that much. I think that Samsung is in a good position to take a lot of share long term because it will accept lower margins than TSMC / Intel.