LinkedIn Q4 – The ecosystem issue.

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

The narrow focus of some ecosystem plays is starting to hurt.

  • First there was Twitter, now there is Linked-in.
  • Linked-in reported disappointing results as growth slowed more than expected causing investors to worry about the longer-term growth.
  • Linked-in, like Twitter, has a valuation (12.4x 2014E EV/Sales), that is already pricing in high growth in the long-term.
  • This means that when doubt creeps in, the shares crater.
  • LinkedIn’s valuation is not nearly as high as Twitter’s (26x 2014E EV/Sales) and so it has not been punished nearly as hard.
  • LinkedIn reported revenues / EPS of $447m / $0.39 compared to forecasts of $437m / $0.38.
  • Guidance was weak with Q1 14E and full year 2014E revenues expected at $455m-$460m and $2.02bn–$2.05bn respectively.
  • This compared badly to consensus at $470m for Q1 14E and $2.16bn for full year 2014E.
  • LinkedIn now has 50% of all knowledge workers in the world on its site (277m) and the challenge now is to win the other half.
  • A large number of these are in China where LinkedIn has only 4m members meaning that this is going to be a real focus for 2014.
  • This will be quite difficult as Chinese sites are better at catering to local requirements and competition for LinkedIn here will be fierce.
  • Historically, US internet companies have not fared well in China, which is such a massive market that it can sustain itself.
  • Hence I suspect that the real answer for LinkedIn is not to grow the user base but to encourage the existing user base to use its site for more Digital Life services.
  • This is exactly the issue that is hobbling Twitter and will eventually also cause Facebook to run out of growth.
  • These companies cover only a part of the Digital Life pie and because they are focused on just that part, their addressable market is limited.
  • RFM research indicates that the revenue opportunity from offering all Digital Life services is significantly greater than the sum of all the pieces.
  • This is for two reasons:
    • First: The more of one’s services a user spends time with, the closer one’s relationship with the user and the more one knows about that user.
    • Hence, advertising can be better targeted and more relevant resulting in a much higher ASP.
    • Second: The more services that the user spends time on, the greater the opportunity the ecosystem provider has to target the user with advertising.
  • Therefore, the whole is substantially greater than the sum of the parts.
  • This is a big reason why Google outstrips everybody else by miles when it comes to revenues.
  • It has all of Digital Life covered except for gaming.
  • This is also the opportunity for Microsoft and Yahoo!.
  • They have great coverage but they have to stitch it all together and make a great experience out of it.
  • This is why Facebook’s first priority is not to get another billion users but to encourage the existing 1.2bn to do more than just social networking.
  • This is what Twitter and LinkedIn must also do.
  • Unfortunately for them, they are out of time. They must act now or their growth and their multiples will continue to contract.
  • This is why I prefer Microsoft and Yahoo!. They have already solved this tricky problem. What they must do now is execute on what they have.

 

 

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.