There is a market in Africa for the taking, but a $199 smartphone is not the device that will do it.
- Huawei and Microsoft have announced a joint initiative to bring smartphones to Africa with the launch of a device and the nurturing of application development.
- This is also being launched at the same time as an initiative to offer cheap wireless internet access in Kenya but it seems to have nothing to do with the devices.
- The customised device is based on the Huawei W1 which I see retailing at $270 or so.
- I suspect that the 4Afrika initiative will have cut a number of corners in its device which is trying to be the cheapest Windows Phone in Africa.
- Unfortunately that is not saying much, and I can’t see this device retailing for much below $199.
- At that price, volumes are going to be very low unless a huge marketing effort is made to convince users why they should pay more than double than what they can get an Android device for.
- Even then, I still think that the price is likely to be way too high, meaning that the initiative’s success will depend on what devices follow the flagship.
- This is especially the case as 4Afrika is targeting tens of millions of devices over the next few years.
- If Microsoft were to drop its $16 (RFM estimate) per unit royalty it would help, but I fear that much more needs to be done to the hardware to bring the cost down.
- The initiative is also working on the application side and the device will launch with a range of Africa specific applications and content to further convince users of the value of the proposition.
- Whatever the rhetoric, this is already a crowded market.
- s40, Bada, Android as well as Sailfish OS and others are all targeting the lower end of the market and some of them have much larger volumes over which to amortise costs.
- I believe that the success or failure of this initiative will depend entirely on the price at which Microsoft and Huawei can put this device into the hands of users.
- In order to really work, I think this price needs to be below $100 which combined with the content might just tip the scales in 4Afrika’s favour.
- At the moment, I like s40 and Nokia’s Asha range for this market, as super cheap Android simply does not work very well and very soon everyone will realise that.
- Compared to cheap Android, Asha, gives users good hardware specification for the buck and uses a mature and well-functioning user experience.
- If all else fails, I think Nokia has a future in addressing the 500m feature phone market that everyone always seems to forget exists.
Blog Comments
tatilsever
February 5, 2013 at 8:07 pm
Why bring up Symbian at all? Nokia’s Symbian sales are down to about 2 million during the last quarter and it was the holiday shopping season. Even if all of them were sold in Africa, it is a negligible number and still going down. Is there another S40 manufacturer left?
windsorr
February 5, 2013 at 8:37 pm
didnt say a word about Symbian,,,,s40 is a propreitary OS owned by Nokia…it has nothing to do with Symbian….thsi is why its so cheap
tatilsever
February 6, 2013 at 9:11 pm
Sorry, I should learn to read better.
The only S40 Nokia phone I owned was a really basic model, I would not dream of browsing with it, even the address book and sending SMS felt very convoluted, so I am surprised to hear that S40 works better than Android as a cheap smartphone.
windsorr
February 7, 2013 at 12:32 pm
The new version of s40 is actually not bad. it works pretty well and outperfroms Android devices in its price category.
Adam Nealis
February 7, 2013 at 1:48 pm
“If Microsoft were to drop its $16 (RFM estimate) per unit royalty it would help, but I fear that much more needs to be done to the hardware to bring the cost down.”
“Drop” as in “reduce”?
Microsoft may very well be “Out Of Africa” if they have the same penetration on that undiscovered continent that they are “enjoying” elsewhere. Interesting if this relatively low affluence part of the world is of strategic importance to them.
windsorr
February 12, 2013 at 11:20 am
Drop as in “get rid of” or reduce to zero!. Low affluence is good for MSFT as it keeps Apple out. That leaves MSFT vs Android. as the only internet device used, I think Android is weak which leaves MSFT as a much easier to use, set up etc ecosystem with a fighting chance,,,price is a factor though,,,,,