Reddit and Twitter look like more realistic targets than Facebook.
- Google has announced a significant restructuring of Google + removing the focus on social networking and instead targeting interests (collections) and communities.
- There is no doubt that Google + has been a huge disappointment and despite substantial investment it has failed to gain any meaningful traction.
- Google can claim hundreds of millions of users thanks to the integrated nature of its services but when one looks at usage of Google +, there is only empty desert.
- The restructuring of Google + is an admission that Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat and so on have won the social networking space meaning that it needs to become something different.
- The new aim of Google + is to focus on two areas collections and communities.
- Collections groups users’ posts around different types of interests which other users can choose to follow.
- Communities is similar to collections except that it encourages more active discussion of the various topics and interests that the community is based around. Users belong to a community rather than follow it.
- With this change it is clear that Google is moving out from social networking and instead focusing on the much softer target of content discovery and online discussions.
- Hence, instead of competition with Facebook, Google is now going after Reddit, Medium, Pinterest, Tumblr, Twitter and so on.
- These companies are not without their own problems and Reddit and Twitter at the moment look like particularly soft targets.
- However, this means that Google’s position in Digital Life now looks substantially weaker as it is no longer competing in the very important social networking space.
- Combine this with Google’s absence in gaming and suddenly its ecosystem looks much weaker in the long-term.
- I do not think that this is going to cause a dent in Google’s advertising revenues today but it raises question marks about Google’s ability to grow its revenues in the long-term.
- Currently, Google monetises the data that it collects from its Digital Life services through search but this is likely to change.
- As monetisation mechanisms become more sophisticated, I see monetisation occurring more directly within the Digital Life services themselves.
- This means that what the ecosystem understands about the user will be monetised more directly through maps, video, games and so on.
- An ecosystem without the services to both understand the user and monetise the traffic, will have real problems in securing long-term growth.
- Hence, I am concerned that Google’s weakness in both gaming and social networking will cause long-term growth problems.
- Add this to all of the other problems that Google currently faces (see here) and I can’t see any reason to remain involved with the shares.
- I would prefer Microsoft, Samsung or even Apple to Google.
Blog Comments
Facebook plans for Messenger, follow its Asian rivals - Nylitik Blog
March 30, 2016 at 2:13 pm
[…] However, it is one thing to cover the pie and quite another to monetise it as the example of Google + shows (see here). […]