Unconformity to the design ensures losses.
- Mozilla has announced that Intex, the Indian handset maker, has launched a Firefox powered device called Cloud FX Phone that will go on sale for $33.
- Later this week, a second device manufactured by Spice Mobility will be launched for the price of $38.
- Both of these devices look like they are based on the $25 smartphone reference design that was launched at MWC this year.
- My view on this platform remains unchanged (see here) in that I believe that the project needs to ship 10m units of the design with no modifications in order to break even.
- Unfortunately, I see evidence that the same problem that killed the “3G for all” program in 2007 occurring yet again.
- In 2007 the winner of that contract (LGE) needed to accumulate more than 6m of orders of its reference SKU in order to ship enough units to break even.
- Unfortunately, every customer wanted something different meaning that LG would end up spending a fortune customising all the variants and consequently lose money on the overall project.
- Consequently the project was quietly put to sleep.
- The same thing appears to be happening again as the Cloud FX phone and the Spice Mobility devices look like they are only loosely based on the standard $25 reference design.
- The specification of the Cloud FX Phone and its price indicate that Intex has tinkered with the specification to make its own version of the device.
- While this is not an issue per se, it means that Intex will have incurred further costs to make its desired variations.
- This is clear in that the device has a 2MP camera while the reference design uses 0.3MP and it has 128MB of RAM while the reference has 1GB of embedded DRAM.
- The fact that the Spice Mobility device will sell for $38 implies that, it too, has made modifications to the standard design.
- The beauty of the reference design is that someone else has done the integration and testing already meaning that all the vendor has to do is put it together.
- This ensures a meaningfully lower development cost and greater economies of scale if parts can all be sourced together.
- This is critical to enabling a handset maker to be able to break-even at a very low price.
- In this instance the reference design is controlled by Spreadtrum who was also tasked with buying all the parts in bulk so that everyone could benefit from lower prices.
- However, it looks like each manufacturer is going it alone which essentially ensures that the $25 price will be missed and everyone will lose money even at the higher price points.
- Furthermore, The Firefox ecosystem is very short on third party apps.
- So much so that WhatsApp connectivity has to be provided by a third party app. on these devices.
- Consequently, these manufacturers are not going to benefit from the scale effect that is so desperately needed to make this project fly.
- I will be surprised if these two devices ship 1m each leaving the project short of 8m devices in the best instance even if everyone was sticking to the script.
- Consequently, I see no way for this project to make money and continue to remain extremely cautious concerning the outlook for the Firefox ecosystem.
Qualcomm vs. Arm – Short b ...
18 December 2024