Dell – Greed and fear

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

I see the possibility that the whole deal collapses.  

  • Some investors seem to think that they have a right to benefit in the potential upside in Dell without taking any of the risk.
  • Some of the existing shareholders are complaining that the valuation at $13.65 a share deal is too low and are holding out for something like $15-$17 a share.
  • In their defence, it is their duty to maximise the return that they earn for their stakeholders but frankly, their arguments have no merit.
  • Dell has been trading very low valuations for a reason. It is at a strategic dead end.
  • It has lost its core competence; its end market is, at best, in a steady state long term and its software and services strategy is still born.
  • To turn this around something drastic has to happen. I outlined the two options that I see here.
  • That drastic action involves risk and could easily blow up in the face of whoever owns the company at that time.
  • For example, if Dell (as a public company) was to announce a huge increase in R&D and a subsequent fall earnings and cash flow for at least two years, I believe the shares would fall hard.
  • This indicates that the market would assume that the strategy fails and simply serves to hasten the company’s decline.
  • On that basis I do not believe that the shares are undervalued.
  • At yesterday’s close of $13.79, Dell was trading at 8.1x 2013 PER and 0.4x 2013 EV / Sales.
  • HPQ which is in a similar or worse pickle than Dell is on 5.1x 2013 PER and 2013 0.5x EV / Sales.
  • Apple (ex-cash) is on 7.2x 2013 PER and 1.8x EV / Sales.
  • Dell does not look cheap even at this price.
  • This is especially the case, if you assume that the company simply chugs along with the PC market and makes no real strategic change.
  • Dell is cheap, only if one assumes that there is a recovery somewhere down the line and it is clear that that is not going to happen without a highly risky strategic shift.
  • The danger for existing shareholders is that they force a price that diminishes the return for those willing to take that risk and as a result they back out.
  • At that point, one would see the price quickly return to trade in line with HPQ with existing shareholders taking a rapid 30% hit.
  • Greed and fear remain as alive and well today as they have ever been.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

[…] When one looks at a market based and DCF based valuation of this scenario, $13.65 is not an unfair price especially when compared to the likes of HPQ and Apple. […]

[…] This is a very dangerous game for investors to play and has all the classic market hallmarks: greed and fear. (see here). […]