China Economy – Semi-Serious

More than the PBOC is needed.

  • China has taken a raft of measures that are finally big enough to stimulate the economy but if China really wants to see a renaissance, it will need to give the private sector more space to invest, create, succeed or fail and critically, make money.
  • After 18 months of drudgery and depression, China’s 2024 5% GDP growth target is at risk and, as minor tweaks have done very little, the People’s Bank of China has finally acted more drastically.
  • The main measures include:
    • First, mortgage rates: which have been cut by 50bp to around 3.0% from 3.5% which will reduce the interest cost on mortgages by around 14%.
    • This goes hand in hand with a reduction of the minimum down payment for a property to 15% from 25%.
    • China’s real estate market is currently in a dreadful state with multiple developers going bankrupt and thousands of unfinished and empty apartments across the country.
    • Many Chinese retail investors are also experiencing negative equity on their properties and so any relief on their costs will free up cash to potentially revive consumer expenditure.
    • The PBOC has tweaked these rates before and this is the first proper intervention since the end of the pandemic, but whether this measure is effective remains to be seen.
    • Second, headline rate cut: where the seven-day reverse repo rate will be cut by 20bp to 1.5% from 1.7% representing a 12% cut in interest costs for borrowers.
    • The PBOC also cut the reserve requirement ratio by 0.5% meaning that local banks will have more money to make available to borrowers at lower interest rates without having to take more deposits from savers.
    • The idea here is to inject liquidity into the economy to spur GDP growth.
    • Third, stock market support: where the PBOC will set up a swap facility that will allow firms easy and simple access to central bank capital to purchase Chinese equities.
    • This will be RMB800bn in size with the possibility to add another RMB500bn if needed over time.
  • The market welcomed these moves with large technology up 3% – 5% and the largest state-owned banks up around 5%, but the long-term success of these measures is very uncertain.
  • Previous measures have resulted in a burst of very short-term enthusiasm which quickly returns to depression as the measures have little long-term impact.
  • These measures are by far the largest measures taken since the pandemic and signal a recognition by the CCP that the economy is not going to turn around without a shift in policy.
  • However, I don’t think that these go far enough as the heavy hand of the state continues to hover above many of its industries and technology in particular.
  • There is nothing in these measures that is likely to encourage founders to start companies again or for investors to relax the onerous demands that they are placing on start-ups in return for financing.
  • Start-ups, entrepreneurs and VCs are the lifeblood of innovation as it is in this segment of the technology industry where it all begins.
  • To fulfil its long-term ambitions, this part of the technology sector needs to be brought back to life.
  • The problem here is that Chinese technology remains moribund mostly as a result of the uncertainty created by regulatory oversight and the perceived disdain of the state for the private sector.
  • Consequently, I don’t think that these measures will do much to fix sentiment and activity in the technology sector which looks set to have yet another rotten year (see here).
  • China’s Technology sector still looks to me like a classic value trap as I do not see policy changing and think that the technology sector will continue to wither.
  • China is home to some of the cheapest technology companies in the world, but it looks like it will stay that way for now.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.