I think Apple is going after radio more than streaming.
- Pandora reported bad Q3 15A results and guided weakly mostly as a result of losing users caused by the launch of Apple Music.
- This further reinforces my view that the real target of Apple Music is radio rather than recorded music streaming.
- Q3 15A revenues / adj-EPS were $312m / $0.11 just short of consensus at $313m / $0.10 but it was in the subscriber figures and outlook for Q4 15E were the trouble really started.
- While the number of listeners increased 2% YoY, it fell by 1.6% QoQ to 78.1m which came as a huge shock to the market.
- Furthermore, Q4 15E revenue guidance was 7% light with $325m-$330m forecast compared to consensus at $352m.
- The real problem was the decline in subscriber numbers and the tacit admission that Apple Music has had an impact.
- This sent the shares down 35% on Friday 23rd
- This, combined with RFM’s research leads me to believe that Apple is in fact chasing the opportunity in radio much more than in recorded music.
- As one music industry executive appropriately put it: “Apple has parked its tanks on Radio’s lawn”.
- When one looks at the numbers this becomes obvious.
- Despite grabbing all the headlines, the recorded music industry is currently worth around $16bn while radio advertising is worth around $44bn per year.
- Even though streaming has kicked the recorded music industry back to growth for the first time in many years, radio is a much riper plum to go after.
- Apple’s music streaming service is still only half-baked and has come in for much criticism (see here) but its radio station, Beats 1, has been well received.
- Furthermore, RFM research indicates that radio stations Beats 2,3,4 and 5 are in development and the plan there is have them advertising funded.
- In radio, Apple is competing against broadcast radio which is a much softer target than its much bigger and better rival in streaming.
- Furthermore, as the opportunity is 3x the size of recorded music and 30x the size of the streaming market, the scope for returns is much higher.
- This fits with RFM research which indicates that Spotify, Deezer and Tidal have yet to see any meaningful impact on their subscriber acquisition numbers from the launch of Apple Music.
- However, for Pandora and Sirius XM, this is an extremely worrying development.
- Pandora has attempted to brush this off as a one-time blip but it is at a massive disadvantage compared to Apple.
- Every iOS device with iOS 8.4 or better is now set up for Beats 1 and its descendants making it the default streaming radio station on over 400m devices.
- History has shown that being the default setting or option on a device confers a huge and often unsurmountable advantage (see here).
- Hence, I suspect that Pandora’s user numbers are not going to recover and over the next year or so may establish a downward trend.
- Pandora’s still has many more users, more experience and much more data to play with but it has to immediately step up and make its service much better than Apple’s.
- Failure to act immediately will result in Friday’s correction being just the beginning of a long and painful kiss goodnight.
Blog Comments
186k
October 27, 2015 at 3:16 pm
I’m not sure there’s enough evidence to support your view that the real target of Apple Music is radio rather than recorded music streaming. It looked to me very much like they went for both but primarily streaming. Also although the radio industry may dwarf that of recorded music, the vast majority of the $44bn figure isn’t currently addressable. In the UK, 86% of radio listening is still via the traditional radio platforms (analogue & DAB)
Is Apple Going After Radio?
October 28, 2015 at 2:10 pm
[…] In fact, John may very well take a stance proffered last week by Dr. Richard Windsor, author of the Radio Free Mobile blog. Earlier this week, Windsor came right out with it: […]